Lara J. Gressley
Biography
Lara grew up in Northern California and received her undergraduate degree at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Lara attended law school at Santa Clara University. While there, she earned the Witkin Award for her work in Constitutional Law, the Best Brief Award in a National Moot Court Competition, made Law Review, was an Honors Moot Court Finalist, and studied law at Oxford University in 2000. In 2002, she graduated from Santa Clara Law on the Dean’s List and with Honors in Public Interest Law. That year, she took and passed the California Bar exam. Lara first worked at the Santa Cruz Public Defender’s Office, where she gained experience defending people charged with drunk driving and other crimes. Lara then worked for Legal Aid Society of San Diego, after which she took a job in Riverside, California where she worked as a Deputy County Counsel and then as a court-appointed trial attorney for individuals charged with serious crimes. As a trial lawyer, Lara obtained not guilty verdicts and dismissals for many of her clients whose charges ranged from drunk driving to burglary, robbery, grand theft auto, and drug offenses. Lara has also successfully defended those facing life in prison. Lara’s primary objective in every case is to obtain justice for her clients.
In private practice, Lara still practices criminal defense and trial work, and has also become one of the preeminent criminal appellate attorneys in California. Lara has written appellate briefs filed in the California Court of Appeal, California Supreme Court, and in the United States Supreme Court. She regularly handles petitions for writ of habeas corpus in state and federal courts involving questions of constitutional law. In one such case, Lara won a petition for writ of habeas corpus due to a Sixth Amendment Confrontation violation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Lara has worked on Amicus briefs in some major appellate cases in California, including People v. Vangelder, People v. Harris, People v. Arredondo, and also handled the appeal in Espinoza v. Shiomoto. Lara and her team prepared Amicus briefs filed in the California Supreme Court in People v. Dungo and in the bail case of In re Humphrey. Lara also prepared Amicus briefs filed in the United States Supreme Court in Williams v. Illinois and in Mitchell v. Wisconsin.
Lara lectures lawyers across the state with respect to constitutional law, research and writing, appeals, writs, motions, DUI defense, and trial work. She has lectured for California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, California DUI Lawyers Association, California Public Defenders Association, and National College for DUI Defense. Lara has also lectured at Pepperdine University School of Law. Due to her experience, Lara has become known by her colleagues as a go-to source on motions in criminal cases, appellate advocacy and procedure, research and writing, DUI defense and collateral consequences, and challenges based on Sixth Amendment confrontation violations. Lara is a contributing author for Donald Bartell’s book, Attacking and Defending Drunk Driving Tests, and coauthored California Vehicle Code section 13353.3(c), enacted in 2012. Lara is the past President and current Vice President of the California DUI Lawyers Association, a Regent for the National College for DUI Defense, and a selected Southern California Super Lawyer in Appellate Law from 2020 to present.
Lara is a Christian, a vocalist, and speaks conversational Spanish.
awards and accolades
dUI, criminal defense & appeals case results
.16%/.17% DUI DMV Hearing Win – First Offense DUI
Our client was contacted by the police after her and her husband pulled their vehicle over due to an argument. A civilian had called 911 to report the wife driving the vehicle poorly. When the police arrived, both the wife and husband denied driving. This means that the only evidence of any driving was a civilian’s hearsay statement, which is not competent evidence at a DMV hearing. The license suspension was set aside, and the client’s license will remain valid.
June 2024
.35% DUI Blood Suppressed at Motion Hearing
Our client was arrested after being located in the passenger seat of a truck on a rural road in the desert. The police arrested her for DUI, and took a sample of her blood. The analysis of her blood revealed a BAC of .35%. Our office filed a motion to suppress evidence, which challenged, among other things, whether her blood was drawn in a medically appropriate manner. After a hearing, the judge ruled the prosecution failed to prove that the blood was drawn in accordance with accepted medical practices, and the client’s BAC cannot be used against her at trial. The case is still pending, and will likely go to trial unless dismissed.
June 2024
DMV Writ of Mandate Win – .12% 2nd Offense for Commercial Driver
Our client (a commercial class A driver) was arrested for a 2nd offense DUI. The DMV suspended his class C and class A after a DMV hearing, which I believed we should have certainly won. Given that we were able to negotiate a reckless driving plea in court and got the DUI charges dismissed, the only thing that suspended the client’s class A was this bad DMV ruling. As a result, I filed a lawsuit against the DMV, challenging the legality of the suspension. Last week, after our first status conference on the writ of mandate, the DMV offered to set aside the suspension against the client’s license, and he will have his class A commercial license back soon.
June 2024
contact us to start building your defense
We understand that being accused of a crime is one of the most challenging times of your life. Rely on us to advocate for your rights and to give you the defense you deserve.